As average development cycles go, patents are applied for when you have the technology at a certain level of development. Therefore it is safe to assume that this is already completed.

Welcome to the psycopaths utopia. Enjoy your stay.

clipped from technology.timesonline.co.uk Microsoft seeks patent for office ’spy’ software Microsoft is developing Big Brother-style software capable of remotely monitoring a worker’s productivity, physical wellbeing and competence. The system would allow managers to monitor employees’ performance by measuring their heart rate, body temperature, movement, facial expression and blood pressure. Unions said they fear that employees could be dismissed on the basis of a computer’s assessment of their physiological state.

Soon you will hear of people voluntaryily sterilising themselves to save mother earth.

You now have the correct frame by which you can understand the motives for such behaviour.

They are coercive forces at play in our societies and you are seeing one manifestation of them in what is NOW called “Climate Change”.

This movement or revolution has many purposes and just one of them is de-population.

Research those popular movements and you will see the same players behind them.

There is no theory about this. That is just a label people who do not want to know put on such facts.

clipped from oldthinkernews.com Coercive population control Frank Notestein clipped from en.wikipedia.org (August 16, 1902 - February 19, 1983) was an American demographer He was also the first director of the Population Division of the United Nations, 1946-1948 clipped from oldthinkernews.com to impose more drastic changes on a large scale implies many risks, not least to the regime that undertakes them. The price for this type of population control may well be the institution of a totalitarian regime. The logical target for legal and institutional pressures is the family: pressures to postpone marriages; economic pressures and inducements for married women to work outside the home; provision of free abortions for all women requesting them; downgrading of familial roles in comparison with extrafamilial roles; and restriction of housing and consumer goods.

Its a different story today though. People cry out for their government to take care of their children.

This has not happened by coincidence. Read Lord Russells’ books on education. In them he says that the government must take over the roll of parents if it is to maintain societal control.

clipped from www.guardian.co.uk Government bid to reshape childhood Nursery places for two-year-olds in plan Government research shows the level of parental engagement in learning is more important in determining a child’s educational achievement than social class, family size or the parent’s own academic attainment. Ministers may also expand parent support advisers who work to provide more effective connections between schools and disaffected parents. Children as young as two are to be offered free nursery care in a government drive to intervene in the lives of disadvantaged children at the very earliest stages of their development. clipped from www.lhup.edu One of the chief obstacles to intelligence and freedom of thought. Bertrand A. Russell (1872-1970) English philosopher, mathematician, and writer.

Don’t believe the lies!!

clipped from disarmament.un.org Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques It is the understanding of the Committee that the following examples are illustrative of phenomena that could be caused by the use of environmental modification techniques as defined in Article II of the Convention: earthquakes, tsunamis; an upset in the ecological balance of a region; changes in weather patterns (clouds, precipitation, cyclones of various types and tornadic storms); changes in climate patterns; changes in ocean currents; changes in the state of the ozone layer; and changes in the state of the ionosphere. military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques as defined in Article II, so as to cause those phenomena as a means of destruction, damage or injury to another State Party, would be prohibited.

clipped from www.wfs.org Here are the editors’ top 10 forecasts from Outlook 2008: 1. The world willhave a billion millionaires by 2025. 2. Fashion will gowired as technologies and tastes converge to revolutionize the textile industry. 3. The threat of another cold war with China, Russia, or both could replace terrorism as the chief foreign-policy concern of the United States 4. Counterfeiting of currency will proliferate, driving the move toward a cashless society. 5. The earth is on the verge of a significant extinction event. 6. Water will be in the twenty-first century what oil was in the twentieth century. 7. World population by 2050 may grow larger than previously expected, due in part to healthier, longer-living people. 8. The number of Africans imperiled by floods will grow 70-fold by 2080 9. Rising prices for natural resources could lead to a full-scale rush to develop the Arctic 10. More decisions will be made by nonhuman entities.

Imagine the control over peoples lives if there was a cashless society? When you think about it we are not too far away from it now. The vast majority of people get paid directly into their bank account. When I started my last job I was told that they would pay me however I liked. Soon I realised that this was not true when I asked them for cash every week. It simply was not convenient enough. Man would sell his soul for convenience sake.

A cashless society is a very serious goal by world bankers and their handlers. I said above that we’re not far off it and this is very true. Since all currency trading is done electronically. No money actually changes hands.

It does not take a much to imagine a cashless society since the majority of us have credit cards already. When you use it no money is exchanged at the point of sale. So it would seem like a natural evolution to move all transactions in this direction since we’re used to it already and it has numerous benefits.

But like everything there are goods reasons and there is the real reason. If you follow my blog, you’ll know the point I am trying to make; nothing is this world is left unplanned. Everything is controlled to guide us all to an end point. Money is central to this control.

As humans we do not like change at all. Everybody has experienced some sort of shock as a result of a sudden change. Whereas if this change comes about very slowly it and what seems quite naturally, then it is more likely to be accepted rather than violently dismissed.

Money should be thought of in the exact same way. It has taken many hundreds of years to get nearly every person on the planet used to the monetary system. This could not have happened overnight as the con would have been spotted straight away and the bankers killed or run of the land.

The same applies to a cashless society. The current generation of people well used to the notes and coins would not be very happy with a sudden change. So in effect, the credit card is like a potty training. It only a build up to the real thing. Sure, there will be lots of people making a lot of money out of it. Its a good reason but not the real reason.

Our children and their children will the people living in a cashless society. The will have been trained subtly in school from an early age to think this is natural. The media they consume will reinforce this message. That is for certain. People need to realise that when this sort of training is going on that they are not in a free falling system - its meticulously planned in advance.

I am not going to finish this post off. I want to invite any person who stumbles upon this post to put the logical end to it by commenting on it. Feel free to let me know what you think. The main point being is to think.

Reading a book recently (Brave New World Revisited) which lightly covers the topic of birth and death control. The author tells the reader that social control experts have awful trouble trying to reduce the population of organisms (the authors way of referring to us human beings). They are coming up with not only chemical ways (through sterilisation of both the sexes) but also sociological ways, mainly through cultural attitudes and behaviours.

Mr O’Briain made a remarkable observation about the sex lifes of the younger generation. All human beings get their behavour from an external source. Based on this, he went on to state that since pornography these days finishes in a different way to a few years ago. That is the man cums outside the woman. The younger generation now view this as the way sexual encounters end.

That got me thinking about population control through sociological means and it occurred to me that this is an ingenius way of teaching a younger generation a method of withdrawal since we mimic what we see!

A quick google search will uncover research that backs up this claim. Make of it what you may.